Cross Function Map Dalam Pembelajaran Smp
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2021.6.2.99-114
Keywords:
Misconception, Field-Independent, Field-Dependent, Relations, Functions
Abstract
Misconception occurs when a person’s conception of material differs from the conception stated by experts in the field. The misconceptions are related to the cognitive style of students. The purpose of this study was to describe the misconceptions experienced by students with Field-Independent (FI) and Field-Dependent (FD) cognitive styles on the topics of relations and functions. This type of research was qualitative research. The research subjects are students of class VIII-I SMPN 1 Jogoroto. Data collection techniques were tests and interviews. The results showed that the misconceptions of FI students were the concept of function, the concept of function in the arrow diagram, and the concept of function graphs and non-function graphs. The misconceptions experienced by FD students were the concept of function, the concept of function in the arrow diagram, the concept of codomain and range, the concepts of function graphs and non-function graphs.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Asidin, M. T. A. N. (2016). Desain Didaktis Materi Relasi dan Kurnia pada Penelaahan Ilmu hitung SMP. Perhimpunan Pendidikan Indonesia.
Aygor, Kaki langit., & Ozdag, H. (2012). Misconceptions in Linear Algebra: the Case of Undergraduate Students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(2002), 2989–2994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.602
Darmadi, D. (2017). Identifikasi Kesalahan Berpikir Visual Mahasiswa dalam Batik Grafik Fungsi Real. Math Didactic: Surat kabar Pendidikan Ilmu hitung, 3(2), 140–144. https://harian.stkipbjm.ac.id/index.php/math/article/view/66
Dzulfikar, A., & Vitantri, C. A. (2017). Miskonsepsi Ilmu hitung sreg Guru Sekolah Dasar. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v3i1.3409
Fitria, A. (2014). Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa dalam Menentukan Grup puas Struktur Aljabar Menunggangi Certainty of Response Index (CRI) di Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika IAIN Antasari. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika IAIN Antasari, 1(2), 45–60.
Gilbert, L., & Gilbert, J. (2009). Elements of Modern Algebra (Seventh Ed). Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
Hammack, R. (2013). Book of Proof (Second Edi). Richard Hammack.
Hamzah, B. U. (2016). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya (n. d.). Bumi Fonem.
Handayani, K. I., M, D., & Kamid. (2021). Kesadaran Pesuluh pada Materi Fungsi Kuadrat dan Fungsi Masuk akal Berdasarkan Teori APOS ditinjau pecah Kecenderungan Kognitif Field Dependence dan Field Independence. Surat kabar Cendikia: Kronik Pendidikan Ilmu hitung, 5(2), 1650–1660.
Irawan, E., Riyadi, & Triyanto. (2012). Amatan Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa STKIP PGRI Pacitan lega Mata Kuliah Pengantar Sumber akar Matematika Pokok Bahasan Logika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Mahasiswa. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v2i1.9942
Kemdikbud. (2013). Permendikbud No. 64 Musim 2022 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Kemdikbud.
Milla, Y. I. El, & Wulan, E. R. (2018). Pemahaman Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika STKIP PGRI Lumajang Terhadap Definisi Manfaat. JP3, 8(2), 624–630.
Morash, R. P. (1987). Bridge to Absract Mathematics. Random House Inc.
Nurlatif, L., Muchyidin, A., & Nursuprianah, I. (2020). Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Pemahaman Konsep Bangun Ruang. JRPM (Surat kabar Review Pembelajaran Ilmu hitung), 5(2), 72–86. http://jurnalftk.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/654
Oh, E., & Lim, D. (2005). Cross Relationships between Cognitive Styles and Learner Variables in Online Learning Environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1), 53–66.
Putri, B. R. K., Nurhilaliati, Horizon., & Kurniawati, K. R. A. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Murid sreg Pembelajaran Ilmu hitung di SMKN 1 Praya Tengah. Paedagoria: Jurnal Analisis, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 8(2), 24–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31764/paedagoria.v8i2.63
Ramadhan, M., Sunardi, & Kuniarti, D. (2017). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa kerumahtanggaan Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Berstandar PISA dengan Menggunakan CRI. Kadikma, 8(1), 145–153.
Ratuanik, M. (2019). Kesadaran Murid Papan bawah VIII B SMP Santo Aloysius Turi Tentang Relasi dan Maslahat Sesudah Penerapan PMRI. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 813–820. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/29272
Saputri, L. A., Muldayanti, N. D., & Setiadi, A. E. (2016). Kajian Miskonsepsi Petatar dengan Certainty of Response Index (CRI) pada Submateri Sistem Saraf di Kelas XI IPA SMA Kewedanan 1 Selimbau. Jurnal Biologi Education, 3(2), 53–62.
Savitri, M. E., Mardiyana, M., & Subanti, S. (2016). Analisis Miskonsepsi Pesuluh pada Materi Pecahan dalam Bentuk Aljabar Ditinjau berpokok Kecenderungan Kognitif Pesuluh Kelas VIII di SMP Kewedanan 2 Adimulyo Kabupaten Kebumen Tahun Ajaran 2022/2014. Surat kabar Elektronik Penelaahan Matematika, 4(4), 401–413. https://alat angkut.neliti.com/media/publications/123130-ID-analisis-miskonsepsi-pesuluh-pada-materi-p.pdf
Snowman, J., McCown, R., & Biehler, R. (2012). Phsycology Applied to Teaching (M. Kerr (ed.); 13 th).
Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. -f. (2001). The Educational Psychology Series Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. American Psychological Association.
Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan Pergantian Konsep intern Pendidikan Fisika. Grasindo.
Umah, U., & Vitantri, C. A. (2019). Representasi Visual Matematis Mahasiswa intern Memodelkan Situasi Dinamis Ditinjau berbunga Perbedaan Mode Serebral dan Jenis Kelamin. FIBONACCI: Buletin Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 5(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.5.1.87-96
Utami, R. (2017). Analisis Miskonsepsi Petatar dan Cara Mengatasinya plong Materi Bentuk Aljabar Kelas bawah VII-C SMP Negeri 13 Malang. JPM : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v3i1.2606
Utomo, D. P. (2012). Mualamat Lengkap dan Prosedural kerumahtanggaan Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Prosiding Matematika, 21–31.
Wijaya, A. P. (2016). Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent dan Tingkat Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Antara Pembelajaran Langsung dan STAD. Jurnal Majemuk kata: Koran Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 1–16. https://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/majemuk frasa/article/view/713
Winarso, W., & Toheri, T. (2017). A Case Study of Misconceptions Students in the Learning of Mathematics; The Concept Limit Function in High School. Kronik Penekanan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 120–127.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64.
Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., Karp, S. A., & Demick, J. (1971). Group Embedded Figures Test [Second Edition Manual]. Mind Garden.
Source: http://jurnalftk.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/1181
