Analisis Instruktional Pembelajaran Ipa Smp

Authors


  • Yayang Prananda

  • Sri Rahayu

  • Safwatun Nida

DOI:


https://doi.org/10.17977/um067v1i3p189–194

Keywords:


scientific literacy, literasi sains, science instructional materials, mangsa pelihara IPA, nature of science, hakikat sains (NOS), critical thinking, berpikir kritis

Abstract

Science instruction aims to achieving the student’s understanding about scientific literacy. However, students’ ability of scientific literacy in Indonesia is far from expectation. Integration of scientific literacy aspects can be done into instructional materials. Instructional materials available nowadays not integrating scientific literacy aspects about energy in life system topics. Neccessary science instructional materials on energy in life system topics that potentially to development scientific literacy. This research use a case study of exploratory and results analysis neccessary science instructional materials with expliciting the nature of science and critical thinking on energy in life system topics.

Pendedahan IPA bertujuan lakukan mewujudkan pesuluh yang berliterasi sains. Cuma, kemampuan literasi sains pesuluh Indonesia masih jauh dari intensi. Pengintegrasian aspek literasi sains dapat dilakukan terhadap incaran ajar. Target didik yang suka-suka belum mengintegrasikan aspek literasi sains puas topik energi dalam sistem kehidupan. Sehingga diperlukan bahan ajar IPA topik energi dalam sistem spirit nan berpotensi melebarkan literasi sains. Pengkhususan ini menggunakan metode studi kasus eksploratis dan menghasilkan kajian kebutuhan sasaran ajar IPA dengan mengeksplisitkan hakikat sains (NOS) dan berpikir kritis topik energi n domestik sistem kehidupan

References

Aulia, A.Lengkung langit., Adisendjaja, Y.H, & Priyandoko, D.. (2014). Analisis buku teks biologi smp di ii kabupaten bandung berdasarkan hakikat sains . Formica Education, 1 (1): 1-15.

Bell, R. L. (2009). Teaching the nature of science: Three critical questions. Best Practices in Science Education, 22, 1-6.

Bell, R. L., Matkins, J. J., & Gansneder, B. M. (2011). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 414-436.

Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: A follow‐up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 563-581.

Cokadar, H. (2012). Photosynthesis and Respiration Processes: Prospective Teachers’ Conception Levels. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 37(164).

Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical Thinking Assessment. Columbus: The Ohio State University.

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois, 2(4).

Handoko, E. A. (2012). Analisis hakikat sains (the nature of science) dalam buku teks pelajaran kimia SMA inferior XI (Doctoral dissertation, Perserikatan Negeri Malang).

Hershey, D. R. (2004). Avoid misconceptions when teaching about plants. Website

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275-288.

Tamadun, K. P. (2013). Materi Pelatihan Hawa Implementasi Kurikulum 2022. Nuh, M.(2013). Kurikulum.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Peradaban, M. P. (2013). Permendikbud No 81 A. Waktu 2022 tentang Implementasi Kurikulum.

Lederman, N. G. (2006, June). Research on nature of science: reflections on the past, anticipations of the future. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching (Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1-11). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.

Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3).

Mahanani, I. (2020). Peluasan bahan ajar materi reaksi redoks dan elektrokimia menggunakan pendekatan saintifik dengan mengeksplisitkan hakikat sains (NOS) dan berpikir dalam-dalam peka. SKRIPSI Mahasiswa UM.

Nazir, M. (2011). Metode Penajaman, Tempaan Ke Tujuh. Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.

Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science education, 87(2), 224-240.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2010). The Example of PISA Questions. Take The Test: Sample Questions From OECD’s PISA Assessments. Website http://www.oecd.org/pisa [accessed 7 September 2022].

Paraskevopoulou, E., & Koliopoulos, D. (2011). Teaching the nature of science through the Millikan-Ehrenhaft dispute. Science & Education, 20(10), 943-960.

Rahayu, S. (2014). Mengarah mahajana berliterasi sains: Pamrih dan tantangan kurikulum 2022. In Seminar Nasional Ilmu pisah dan Pembelajarannya (pp. 27-40).

Rahayu, S. (2016). Mengembangkan literasi sains anak indonesia melalui pembelajaran merentang nature of science (NOS). Kertas kerja disajikan dalam Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Segara Jamiah Daerah Malang, Malang, 17.

Rosana, D. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dalam pembelajaran IPA secara terpadu. In Seminar Kewarganegaraan Unnes (pp. 4-21).

Ross, P. A., Tronson, D., & Ritchie, R. A. J. (2006). Modelling photosynthesis to increase conceptual understanding. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 84-88.

Tinggi, D. J. P. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (Depdiknas).(2008). Hasil Evaluasi Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal Perguruan Tingkatan Tahun 2008.

Ulfatin, N. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif di satah pendidikan: teori dan aplikasinya: riset kasus, etnografi, interaksi simbolik, dan pengkajian tindakan pada konteks manajemen pendidikan. Malang: FIP Universitas Negeri Malang.

Wenning, C. J. (2006). A framework for teaching the nature of science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 3(3), 3-10.

Wenning, C. J. (2010). Science Literacy: What It Is, How to Assess It, and A Way to Achieve It. Website http://www.phy.ilstu.edu/pte/INDONESIA/PDFs/G.%20SciLit-What_%26_How.pdf [accessed 28 Agustus 2022].

Yuliati, L. (2008). Sempurna-model Pembelajaran Fisika: Teori dan Praktek. Malang: LP3 Institut Negeri Malang.

Source: http://journal3.um.ac.id/index.php/mipa/article/view/261